ゲーム
Pilot 暗号資産クラッシュゲーム
Gamzix introduced Pilot in September 2022 as its first crash title — a minimalist red plane rising against a black background. Reported RTP sits around 96.5%, and its provably fair system is unusually elaborate, combining one server-side seed with three separate client-side seed values rather than the more common single-client-seed setup.
テスト担当 Elena Rhodes
- プロバイダー
- Gamzix
- リリース
- 2022
- RTP
- 96.5%
- 最大倍率
- 10000x
- ボラティリティ
- high
- プロヴァブリーフェア
- 対応
BTC
ETH
USDT
Bitcoin Lightning Network
Ethereum
TRON
BNB Smart Chain資金シミュレーション
Pilotの公表RTP 96.5%を基に、資金$200をシミュレーションした数学的モデルです。実際に資金を投入してプレイした記録ではありません。
| セッション | ベット額 | ラウンド数 | 結果 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative — 1.5x auto-cashout | $10 | 60 | +$45.00 |
| Moderate — 2.5x auto-cashout | $15 | 45 | $-112.50 |
| Aggressive — 6x auto-cashout | $10 | 30 | +$120.00 |
合計: +$52.50 (26.3% ROI)
主な結果
- • Modeled on Pilot's reported 96.5% RTP using the standard crash-point formula — a simulation, not a funded playtest.
- • This seeded run landed net positive, driven by above-average hit rates on the conservative and aggressive legs offsetting a weak moderate leg.
- • Reported maximum multiplier figures for Pilot vary meaningfully by source (1,000x versus 10,000x), so any bankroll plan targeting the extreme end should treat that ceiling as uncertain.
課題
- • The multi-seed provably fair system, while more elaborate than most, also makes manual verification slightly more involved for players who want to check it themselves.
- • TRC20 rails handle Pilot's typical stake sizes cheaply and quickly.
A positive simulated session here is variance, not evidence of an edge — over a long run the roughly 3.5% house edge dominates regardless of individual session outcomes.
倍率の確率と報告された極端な事例
500x
Gamzix doesn't publish a verified record-win archive for Pilot, and sources disagree on the actual ceiling (some cite 1,000x, others up to 10,000x). At a 96.5% RTP, roughly 9.65% of rounds reach 10x and about 0.965% reach 100x regardless of where the exact ceiling sits, since those lower thresholds are well below either reported cap. One independent review claims to have manually checked 100+ rounds against the provably fair hash and found no discrepancies, though that review isn't something we can independently confirm.
コミュニティ報告(未検証)このゲームの独自性
対 JetX
- ✓ Pilot's multi-seed (one server, three client) provably fair setup is more elaborate than JetX's standard single-client-seed SHA-256 chain.
- ✓ JetX's 25,000x published ceiling is clearly higher than either of Pilot's reported figures (1,000x or 10,000x, depending on source).
独自のポイント
- 1. Minimalist red-plane-on-black visual design, distinct from the more elaborate art direction common in this genre.
- 2. Unusually elaborate provably fair system combining one server seed with three separate client seeds.
- 3. Gamzix's first and flagship crash title, launched September 2022.
プレイヤーが資金を失いやすいポイント
Assuming the higher reported ceiling (10,000x) is confirmed
シナリオ: Planning a bankroll strategy around a 10,000x target based on the higher of two conflicting source figures.
失敗する理由: Sources disagree on Pilot's actual ceiling — treating the unconfirmed higher number as fact overstates realistic upside.
対策: Plan around the lower, more conservative reported ceiling until Gamzix publishes an official figure.
Skipping verification because the multi-seed system looks complex
シナリオ: Avoiding the provably fair check specifically because it involves more than one client seed.
失敗する理由: The added complexity doesn't make verification optional — it's still available through the game's built-in tool.
対策: Use the in-client verifier rather than attempting manual multi-seed verification by hand.
No stop-loss on a minimalist-feeling game
シナリオ: Assuming a simple visual design means lower stakes risk.
失敗する理由: Visual simplicity has no bearing on the house edge or bust probability of any given round.
対策: Apply the same fixed stop-loss discipline used on any other crash title.
Chasing losses after a moderate-target cold stretch
シナリオ: Increasing bet size after several 2.5x targets miss in a row.
失敗する理由: Round outcomes are independent — a cold stretch on one target doesn't change the odds of the next round.
対策: Keep bet sizing flat regardless of recent target misses.
Betting on a hunch about 'due' jackpot-style multipliers
シナリオ: Assuming a large multiplier is more likely after a long stretch without one.
失敗する理由: The crash-point distribution has no memory — each round draws independently from the same curve.
対策: Ignore recent-history patterns entirely when setting targets.
資金管理戦略
conservative
- ベット額
- $4
- ラウンド数
- 100
- 継続率
- 100%
- 時間
- 20 分
-$14.09 avg net over 100 rounds (simulated, $200 bankroll)
moderate
- ベット額
- $10
- ラウンド数
- 60
- 継続率
- 97.8%
- 時間
- 14 分
-$21.97 avg net over 60 rounds (simulated, $200 bankroll)
aggressive
- ベット額
- $20
- ラウンド数
- 30
- 継続率
- 57.1%
- 時間
- 8 分
-$12.43 avg net over 30 rounds (simulated, $200 bankroll)
おすすめカジノ
セキュリティと公平性
- アルゴリズム
- SHA-256
- ライセンス
- Curaçao eGaming (Gamzix)
The multi-seed provably fair design is a genuine step up in verification rigor over a standard single-seed chain; we have not personally re-verified rounds ourselves.