ゲーム
Spaceman 暗号資産クラッシュゲーム
Pragmatic Play entered crash gaming in March 2022 with Spaceman, its first title in the category after years as a slots powerhouse. An astronaut floats upward on a rising multiplier; the signature feature is a 50% partial cashout that locks in half your stake at a chosen multiplier while the rest keeps riding. Unlike the crypto-native titles on this list, Spaceman runs on certified RNG rather than a client-verifiable provably fair chain.
テスト担当 Devon Cole
- プロバイダー
- Pragmatic Play
- リリース
- 2022
- RTP
- 96.5%
- 最大倍率
- 5000x
- ボラティリティ
- medium
- プロヴァブリーフェア
- RNG認証済み
BTC
ETH
USDT
Bitcoin Lightning Network
Ethereum
TRON
BNB Smart Chain資金シミュレーション
Spacemanの公表RTP 96.5%を基に、資金$200をシミュレーションした数学的モデルです。実際に資金を投入してプレイした記録ではありません。
| セッション | ベット額 | ラウンド数 | 結果 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative — 1.5x auto-cashout | $10 | 60 | +$0.00 |
| Moderate — 2.5x auto-cashout | $15 | 45 | $-75.00 |
| Aggressive — 6x auto-cashout | $10 | 30 | $-180.00 |
合計: $-255.00 (-127.5% ROI)
主な結果
- • Modeled on Pragmatic Play's own published 95.5%–96.5% RTP range for Spaceman (we used 96.5% for this run) and the standard crash-point formula — a simulation, not a funded playtest.
- • This seeded run landed well below the 3.5% expected house-edge drag, illustrating how much variance a 135-round sample still carries.
- • The 50% partial-cashout mechanic wasn't modeled — this simulation used single fixed-target cashouts only.
課題
- • Pragmatic Play's RTP is operator-configurable within a published range, so the number displayed in the client can genuinely differ between casinos.
- • Because there's no client-side seed to verify, players have to trust the RNG certificate rather than reproduce the outcome themselves.
Nothing in this simulation suggests Spaceman's math behaves differently from any other crash game at a similar house edge — a below-average run here is ordinary variance, not evidence of anything unusual.
倍率の確率と報告された極端な事例
500x
Spaceman is capped at a hard 5,000x maximum multiplier, so nothing above that is possible regardless of what's claimed. At a 96.5% RTP, roughly 9.65% of rounds reach 10x, about 0.965% reach 100x, and reaching the 5,000x ceiling itself sits at roughly a 0.019% chance per round — around 1 in 5,200. Screenshots of near-max hits circulate online but Pragmatic Play doesn't publish a verifiable win archive.
コミュニティ報告(未検証)このゲームの独自性
対 Aviator
- ✓ Spaceman uses certified RNG rather than Aviator's client-verifiable provably fair chain.
- ✓ Spaceman's 50% partial-cashout has no direct Aviator equivalent.
- ✓ Aviator's multiplier is effectively uncapped; Spaceman is hard-capped at 5,000x.
- ✓ Both use a spacefaring theme, but Astronaut is provably fair via HMAC-SHA256 while Spaceman relies on RNG certification.
- ✓ Astronaut's published cap (10,000x) is double Spaceman's 5,000x.
独自のポイント
- 1. 50% partial-cashout: bank half the stake at one multiplier while the remainder keeps climbing.
- 2. Backed by Pragmatic Play's broad regulatory footprint across MGA, UKGC, and other licensed markets.
- 3. Consistent, certified RNG rather than a per-round client-verifiable hash — different fairness model, not a lesser one.
プレイヤーが資金を失いやすいポイント
Assuming provably fair applies here
シナリオ: Looking for a seed-verification tool that doesn't exist on this title.
失敗する理由: Spaceman runs on certified RNG, not a client-side provably fair chain — there's no round hash to check.
対策: Trust the RNG certificate and regulator, not a verification tool that isn't part of this game.
Misusing the 50% cashout as a full exit
シナリオ: Clicking 50% cashout and assuming the whole bet is now safe.
失敗する理由: Only half the stake is locked in; the other half is still live and can still bust to zero.
対策: Treat the 50% cashout as risk reduction, not risk elimination.
Comparing RTP across operators as if fixed
シナリオ: Assuming the RTP is identical everywhere Spaceman is offered.
失敗する理由: Pragmatic Play's RTP is configurable within a published range, so two casinos can legitimately run different numbers.
対策: Check the in-client RTP disclosure on the specific operator before relying on a general '96.5%' figure.
No stop-loss on a capped-multiplier game
シナリオ: Assuming a 5,000x cap makes the game 'safer' and betting bigger.
失敗する理由: The multiplier cap affects the upside, not the downside — the house edge and bust risk on any given round are unchanged.
対策: Apply the same fixed stop-loss discipline used on any other crash title.
Chasing the astronaut's visible trajectory
シナリオ: Betting bigger because the last few rounds visually 'felt' higher.
失敗する理由: RNG outcomes are independent; there's no momentum between rounds.
対策: Ignore the visual pattern of recent rounds when sizing the next bet.
資金管理戦略
conservative
- ベット額
- $4
- ラウンド数
- 100
- 継続率
- 100%
- 時間
- 20 分
-$14.05 avg net over 100 rounds (simulated, $200 bankroll)
moderate
- ベット額
- $10
- ラウンド数
- 60
- 継続率
- 97.7%
- 時間
- 14 分
-$20.36 avg net over 60 rounds (simulated, $200 bankroll)
aggressive
- ベット額
- $20
- ラウンド数
- 30
- 継続率
- 58%
- 時間
- 8 分
-$11.96 avg net over 30 rounds (simulated, $200 bankroll)
おすすめカジノ
セキュリティと公平性
- アルゴリズム
- RNG certified (not provably fair)
- ライセンス
- MGA-certified RNG (Pragmatic Play holds licenses across multiple jurisdictions)
Honest framing matters here: Spaceman is not a provably fair game in the client-verifiable sense despite some third-party sites labeling it that way — it relies on independent RNG certification instead.