게임
Spaceman 암호화폐 크래시 게임
Pragmatic Play entered crash gaming in March 2022 with Spaceman, its first title in the category after years as a slots powerhouse. An astronaut floats upward on a rising multiplier; the signature feature is a 50% partial cashout that locks in half your stake at a chosen multiplier while the rest keeps riding. Unlike the crypto-native titles on this list, Spaceman runs on certified RNG rather than a client-verifiable provably fair chain.
테스트 담당 Devon Cole
- 프로바이더
- Pragmatic Play
- 출시일
- 2022
- RTP
- 96.5%
- 최대 배당배수
- 5000x
- 변동성
- medium
- Provably Fair
- RNG 인증
BTC
ETH
USDT
Bitcoin Lightning Network
Ethereum
TRON
BNB Smart Chain뱅크롤 시뮬레이션
Spaceman의 공식 RTP 96.5%를 기준으로 $200 뱅크롤을 수학적으로 시뮬레이션한 결과이며, 실제 자금으로 플레이한 기록이 아닙니다.
| 세션 | 베팅액 | 라운드 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative — 1.5x auto-cashout | $10 | 60 | +$0.00 |
| Moderate — 2.5x auto-cashout | $15 | 45 | $-75.00 |
| Aggressive — 6x auto-cashout | $10 | 30 | $-180.00 |
합계: $-255.00 (-127.5% ROI)
주요 발견
- • Modeled on Pragmatic Play's own published 95.5%–96.5% RTP range for Spaceman (we used 96.5% for this run) and the standard crash-point formula — a simulation, not a funded playtest.
- • This seeded run landed well below the 3.5% expected house-edge drag, illustrating how much variance a 135-round sample still carries.
- • The 50% partial-cashout mechanic wasn't modeled — this simulation used single fixed-target cashouts only.
주의할 점
- • Pragmatic Play's RTP is operator-configurable within a published range, so the number displayed in the client can genuinely differ between casinos.
- • Because there's no client-side seed to verify, players have to trust the RNG certificate rather than reproduce the outcome themselves.
Nothing in this simulation suggests Spaceman's math behaves differently from any other crash game at a similar house edge — a below-average run here is ordinary variance, not evidence of anything unusual.
배당배수 확률 및 보고된 극단값
500x
Spaceman is capped at a hard 5,000x maximum multiplier, so nothing above that is possible regardless of what's claimed. At a 96.5% RTP, roughly 9.65% of rounds reach 10x, about 0.965% reach 100x, and reaching the 5,000x ceiling itself sits at roughly a 0.019% chance per round — around 1 in 5,200. Screenshots of near-max hits circulate online but Pragmatic Play doesn't publish a verifiable win archive.
커뮤니티 보고, 미검증이 게임만의 특징
vs Aviator
- ✓ Spaceman uses certified RNG rather than Aviator's client-verifiable provably fair chain.
- ✓ Spaceman's 50% partial-cashout has no direct Aviator equivalent.
- ✓ Aviator's multiplier is effectively uncapped; Spaceman is hard-capped at 5,000x.
vs Astronaut
- ✓ Both use a spacefaring theme, but Astronaut is provably fair via HMAC-SHA256 while Spaceman relies on RNG certification.
- ✓ Astronaut's published cap (10,000x) is double Spaceman's 5,000x.
차별화 포인트
- 1. 50% partial-cashout: bank half the stake at one multiplier while the remainder keeps climbing.
- 2. Backed by Pragmatic Play's broad regulatory footprint across MGA, UKGC, and other licensed markets.
- 3. Consistent, certified RNG rather than a per-round client-verifiable hash — different fairness model, not a lesser one.
플레이어들이 돈을 잃는 지점
Assuming provably fair applies here
상황: Looking for a seed-verification tool that doesn't exist on this title.
실패 이유: Spaceman runs on certified RNG, not a client-side provably fair chain — there's no round hash to check.
해결책: Trust the RNG certificate and regulator, not a verification tool that isn't part of this game.
Misusing the 50% cashout as a full exit
상황: Clicking 50% cashout and assuming the whole bet is now safe.
실패 이유: Only half the stake is locked in; the other half is still live and can still bust to zero.
해결책: Treat the 50% cashout as risk reduction, not risk elimination.
Comparing RTP across operators as if fixed
상황: Assuming the RTP is identical everywhere Spaceman is offered.
실패 이유: Pragmatic Play's RTP is configurable within a published range, so two casinos can legitimately run different numbers.
해결책: Check the in-client RTP disclosure on the specific operator before relying on a general '96.5%' figure.
No stop-loss on a capped-multiplier game
상황: Assuming a 5,000x cap makes the game 'safer' and betting bigger.
실패 이유: The multiplier cap affects the upside, not the downside — the house edge and bust risk on any given round are unchanged.
해결책: Apply the same fixed stop-loss discipline used on any other crash title.
Chasing the astronaut's visible trajectory
상황: Betting bigger because the last few rounds visually 'felt' higher.
실패 이유: RNG outcomes are independent; there's no momentum between rounds.
해결책: Ignore the visual pattern of recent rounds when sizing the next bet.
뱅크롤 전략
conservative
- 베팅액
- $4
- 라운드
- 100
- 생존율
- 100%
- 시간
- 20 분
-$14.05 avg net over 100 rounds (simulated, $200 bankroll)
moderate
- 베팅액
- $10
- 라운드
- 60
- 생존율
- 97.7%
- 시간
- 14 분
-$20.36 avg net over 60 rounds (simulated, $200 bankroll)
aggressive
- 베팅액
- $20
- 라운드
- 30
- 생존율
- 58%
- 시간
- 8 분
-$11.96 avg net over 30 rounds (simulated, $200 bankroll)
추천 카지노
보안 및 공정성
- 알고리즘
- RNG certified (not provably fair)
- 라이선스
- MGA-certified RNG (Pragmatic Play holds licenses across multiple jurisdictions)
Honest framing matters here: Spaceman is not a provably fair game in the client-verifiable sense despite some third-party sites labeling it that way — it relies on independent RNG certification instead.